Skip to content
Tuesday, October 13, 2026
Discover expert insights on home design, interior decor, an…

Will Different States Pursue Australia's in Banning Online Networks for Under-16s?

Australia's decisive action to prohibit social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising number of countries are exploring comparable bans.

  • Denmark has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that mobile devices and platforms are "robbing our children's childhood". A law is expected to be passed next year.
  • Norway is preparing to implement a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to protect children from the "influence of the AI".
  • Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media users. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "an options under consideration".
  • In The Spanish government, the president has called on parliament to enact a bill lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
  • In The French government, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a related move, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
  • The authorities in The Netherlands has advised guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding resolution calling for a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is provided. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the step does not enact binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a useful starting point," stated the MEP supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in strong data".

Previously, momentum built behind a proposal to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. However, the administration pledged to further research the matter.

Charities have expressed warnings. An organization established by the relatives of a teenager who was lost after being exposed to disturbing social media material contends that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to build products and services that are safe and fit for children," stated a prominent peer.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, legislation is mostly occurring at the regional level amid country-wide stalemate.

  • Utah mandates parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
  • Florida has passed a law prohibiting those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
  • Virginia has approved a regulation capping under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with extra time requiring a guardian's okay.
  • Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted measures demanding guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from various individuals to follow this lead, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Beyond these regions, further nations are similarly considering moves.

  • The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
  • The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world agencies take a more nuanced stance. The UN children's agency has advised that social media bans have downsides and "could have unintended consequences". The body highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

While this global debate unfolds, the actions of this nation and its followers demonstrate that policymakers around the world are increasingly content to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.

By

Carl Hensley

A seasoned interior designer with over a decade of experience transforming urban homes into elegant sanctuaries.

Urban Palace Pro

Type to search articles.